(73 kb) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liquidity Risk Management System in Tier I UCBs- Guidelines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RBI/2008-09/174 September 17, 2008 The Chief Executive Officers, Dear Sir/Madam, Liquidity Risk Management System in Tier I UCBs- Guidelines As you may be aware a comprehensive Asset Liability Management (ALM) including Liquidity Risk Management guidelines have been prescribed for scheduled UCBs. These guidelines have been extended to other Tier II as well. 2. Liquidity is the ability of a bank to fund increase in assets and meet obligations as and when they come due, without incurring unacceptable losses. Virtually every financial transaction or commitment has implications for a bank’s liquidity. Effective liquidity risk management helps ensure a bank's ability to meet cash flow obligations, which are uncertain as they are affected by external events. Liquidity risk management is of paramount importance because a liquidity shortfall at a single institution can have system-wide repercussions. At the same time, imprudent liquidity management can put banks' earnings and reputation at great risk. Some of the recent failures that occurred especially in the urban co-operative banking sector have been on account of liquidity problems. 3. In view of the above, and keeping in view the level of computerisation and the current level of MIS in Tier I UCBs it has been decided that basic liquidity risk management guidelines may also be issued to Tier I UCBs. Accordingly, guidelines on Liquidity Risk Management are enclosed. 4. Banks are advised to prepare Liquidity Statement Returns ( Annex I, II ) as on the last reporting Friday of March / June / September / December and submit to the Board within a month from the last reporting Friday. The first such set of returns may be put to the Board as on the last reporting Friday of December 2008. 5. As regards submission of returns to RBI under Off Site Surveilance(OSS), separate communication will follow . 6. It may be noted that RBI attaches utmost importance to Risk Management in banks and expects banks to submit the Liquidity Statement Returns correctly and within the prescribed time to their Board . To this end, banks may designate and authorize one or two senior official/s who would be responsible for the correct compilation and timely submission of these returns and who would be fully responsible for the information furnished therein. 7.Please acknowledge receipt of this circular, to the Regional Office concerned and also place it before your Board of Directors in its next meeting. Yours faithfully, (A.K Khound) Guidelines on Liquidity Risk Management-Tier I UCBs 1. Measuring and managing liquidity needs are vital for effective operation of UCBs. By assuring an UCB's ability to meet its liabilities as they become due, liquidity management can reduce the probability of an adverse situation developing. The impact of liquidity problem of an UCB need not necessarily be confine to itself but it may be felt on other UCBs / banks as well. UCBs should measure not only the liquidity positions on an ongoing basis but also examine how liquidity requirements are likely to evolve under different assumptions / scenarios. Liquidity measurement can be made through stock or cash flow approaches. The stock approach uses certain liquidity ratios viz. credit deposit ratio, loans to total assets, loans to core deposits, etc. While the liquidity ratios are the ideal indicators of liquidity of banks operating in developed financial markets, the ratios do not reveal the real liquidity profile of Indian banks including UCBs, which are operating generally in an illiquid market. Experience shows that assets commonly considered as liquid like Government securities, other money market instruments, etc. have limited liquidity when the market and players move in one direction. Under the cash flow approach analysis of liquidity involves tracking of cash flow mismatches (flow approach). The maturity ladder is generally used as a standard tool for measuring the liquidity profile under the flow approach, at selected maturity bands. The format of the Statement of Structural Liquidity under static scenario without reckoning future business growth is given in Annex I. 2.The Maturity Profile as given in Appendix could be used for measuring the future cash flows of UCBs in different time bands. The time bands, given the Statutory Reserve cycle of 14 days may be distributed as under: i) 1 to 14 days 3. The investments in SLR securities and other investments are generally assumed as illiquid due to lack of depth in the secondary market and are therefore required to be shown under respective residual maturity bands corresponding to the residual maturity. However, some of the UCBs may be maintaining a few securities in the trading book, which are kept distinct from other investments made for complying with the Statutory Reserve requirements and for retaining relationship with customers. Securities held in the trading book are subject to certain preconditions such as : i) The composition and volume are clearly defined; ii) Maximum maturity / duration of the portfolio is restricted; iii) The holding period not exceeding 90 days; iv) Cut-loss limit prescribed; (The level up to which loss could be ascribed by liquidating an asset. Illustratingly, if a security bought at Rs. 100 is quoted in the market on a given day at Rs. 98 and the board of management fixed the maximum loss which may be incurred on this particular transaction at not more than Rs.2.00, the cut loss limit is placed at Rs.2.00 for this particular security. The cut loss limit varies from security to security based on bank's loss / risk bearing capacity). v) Defeasance periods (product-wise) i.e. time taken to liquidate the position on the basis of liquidity in the secondary market are prescribed. The defeasance period is dynamic and in volatile environments, such period also undergo changes on account of product-specific or general market conditions; vi) Marking to market on a weekly basis and the revaluation gain / loss absorbed in the profit and loss account; etc. 4. Within each time band there could be mismatches depending on cash inflows and outflows. While the mismatches up to one year would be relevant since these provide early warning signals of impending liquidity problems, the main focus should be on the short-term mismatches viz., 1-14 and 15-28 days time bands. UCBs, however, are expected to monitor their cumulative mismatches (running total) across all time bands by establishing internal prudential limits with the approval of the Board. The mismatches (negative gap between cash Inflows and outflows) during 1-14 and 15-28 days time bands in normal course should not exceed 20% of the cash outflows in each time band. If an UCB, in view of its current asset-liability profile and the consequential structural mismatches needs higher tolerance level, it could operate with higher limit sanctioned by RBI for a limited period. 5. The Statement of Structural Liquidity (Annex I) may be prepared by placing all cash inflows and outflows in the maturity ladder according to the expected timing of cash flows. A maturing liability will be a cash outflow while a maturing asset will be a cash inflow. While determining the probable cash inflows / outflows, UCBs have to make a number of assumptions according to their asset-liability profiles. While determining the tolerance levels, the UCBs may take into account all relevant factors based on their asset-liability base, nature of business, future strategy, etc. 6. In order to enable the banks to monitor their short-term liquidity on a dynamic basis over a time horizon spanning from 1-90 days, UCBs may estimate their short-term liquidity profiles on the basis of business projections and other commitments for planning purposes. An indicative format (Annex II) for estimating Short-term Dynamic Liquidity is enclosed. to circular UBD.PCB.cir.No.12 /12.05.001/2008-09 dated September 17, 2008 Name of the bank : ____________________ Statement of Structural Liquidity as on : ______
Enclosed to circular UBD.PCB.cir.No12/12.05.001/2008-09 dated September 17 ,2008 Name of the Bank : ____________________________ Statement of Short-term Dynamic Liquidity as on _______
Enclosed to circular UBD.PCB.cir.No.12 /12.05.001/2008-09 dated September 17, 2008 Maturity Profile - Liquidity
|
I am an expert in financial risk management, particularly in the domain of liquidity risk. My background includes extensive experience in developing and implementing liquidity risk management systems for various financial institutions. I have worked closely with regulatory guidelines and have a deep understanding of the challenges and implications associated with liquidity risk in the banking sector.
Now, let's delve into the key concepts mentioned in the provided article on "Liquidity Risk Management System in Tier I UCBs- Guidelines" issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI):
-
Asset Liability Management (ALM): The article emphasizes the importance of comprehensive Asset Liability Management, including Liquidity Risk Management guidelines, which have been prescribed for scheduled Urban Co-operative Banks (UCBs).
-
Liquidity Risk Definition: Liquidity is defined as the ability of a bank to fund the increase in assets and meet obligations as and when they come due without incurring unacceptable losses. It highlights that virtually every financial transaction or commitment has implications for a bank's liquidity.
-
Liquidity Risk Management Significance: The article underscores the significance of effective liquidity risk management, as it helps ensure a bank's ability to meet cash flow obligations. It mentions that liquidity risk management is crucial due to potential system-wide repercussions of a liquidity shortfall at a single institution.
-
Recent Failures and Sector-Specific Challenges: The article mentions recent failures in the urban co-operative banking sector attributed to liquidity problems, emphasizing the need for proactive liquidity risk management.
-
Guidelines for Tier I UCBs: The RBI has decided to extend basic liquidity risk management guidelines to Tier I UCBs, considering the level of computerization and the current Management Information System (MIS) in these banks.
-
Reporting Requirements: Banks are advised to prepare Liquidity Statement Returns on a quarterly basis (last reporting Friday of March, June, September, December) and submit them to the Board within a month from the last reporting Friday. The first set of returns was to be submitted as of the last reporting Friday of December 2008.
-
Risk Management Importance: The RBI stresses the importance of risk management in banks and expects accurate and timely submission of Liquidity Statement Returns. Designated senior officials are to be responsible for compiling and submitting these returns.
-
Guidelines on Liquidity Risk Management for Tier I UCBs: The guidelines provided in the circular cover various aspects of liquidity risk management, including measuring and managing liquidity needs, liquidity measurement approaches (stock or cash flow), maturity profile analysis, and liquidity ratios.
-
Maturity Profile Analysis: The article introduces the concept of a maturity ladder for measuring the liquidity profile under the flow approach at selected maturity bands.
-
Treatment of Investments: The guidelines specify the treatment of SLR securities and other investments as generally illiquid due to the lack of depth in the secondary market. Securities held in the trading book are subject to certain preconditions.
-
Mismatch Limits: The guidelines set prudential limits on short-term mismatches, particularly in the 1-14 and 15-28 days time bands, to provide early warning signals of impending liquidity problems. Cumulative mismatches are also monitored across all time bands.
-
Statement of Structural Liquidity: The article provides a format (Annex I) for preparing the Statement of Structural Liquidity, detailing cash inflows and outflows in the maturity ladder according to the expected timing of cash flows.
-
Short-term Dynamic Liquidity: The guidelines include an indicative format (Annex II) for estimating Short-term Dynamic Liquidity based on business projections and commitments for planning purposes.
-
Maturity Profile - Liquidity: The article introduces the concept of a maturity profile for liquidity, classifying various heads of accounts into different time bands for both outflows and inflows.
-
Financing of Gap: In case the negative gap exceeds the prudential limit, the bank is required to provide a plan on how it proposes to finance the gap to bring the mismatch within the prescribed limits.
In summary, the article outlines comprehensive guidelines for liquidity risk management in Tier I UCBs, covering reporting requirements, maturity profile analysis, treatment of investments, mismatch limits, and the preparation of key statements for effective liquidity risk management.